Abu Ghraib Comes to Amerika

Sabrina Harman posing over the body of Manadel...

Image via Wikipedia

Torture Unit Under Construction at Virginia’s Red Onion State Prison
October 30, 2010

by prisoner Kevin “Rashid” Johnson

Virginia Justifies a Torture Unit

This past summer a Black prisoner was strangled to death on a segregation exercise yard at Virginia’s remote Red Onion State Prison. A white prisoner is alleged to have committed the killing.1 This incident caps a long history of Red Onion officials manipulating and facilitating racial conflict between prisoners.2
But instead of exposing and addressing this fact, this tragedy is being used to justify the secretive construction of a torture unit at the prison. Desires to operate such a unit have long been floated by Red Onion’s Warden Tracy S. Ray, but were not pursued until now because of lack of sufficient funds and plausible justification. With this recent death, however, Ray now has both his selling point and justification. The unit has been approved, funded and is under construction in the prison’s B-3 housing unit.

According to one Red Onion lieutenant, enough money is being spent on the unit’s construction “to build a whole new prison.”  A list of candidates for the unit has already been compiled. I’ve been told repeatedly that my name tops it. The list is almost entirely Black and consists of prisoners who have distinguished
themselves for resisting and speaking out against the notoriously abusive and racist conditions at Red Onion.

Although the unit’s projected design and living conditions have been shrouded in secrecy to avoid outside scrutiny, leaks have come out to local attorneys who have relatives and contacts who work at Red Onion, and from minimum security ‘cadre’ inmates who, for pennies an hour, have been working overtime for over two months so far constructing the unit. Assignments to B-3 will be punitive, brutal, and indefinite and will inflict tortures designed for and used against “enemy combatants” at the Guantánamo Bay and Abu Ghraib detention centers. Ranking Red Onion officials admit its actual purpose will be to apply, study, and
advance methods of mentally breaking those with dissident, oppositional, and otherwise ‘unacceptable’ attitudes. When U. S. intelligence agencies began experiments and studies in torture after World War II,3 allegedly for use against dangerous foreign enemies, they cited the same purposes. The implications are ominous.

Advanced Modern Torture – Amerikan Style
In a 2007 article,4 I showed a general parallel between the torturous conditions of modern U.S. Prisons and the advanced torture techniques (psychological warfare) developed and applied against foreign “enemies” by the CIA and U.S. Military. Red Onion’s torture unit now shows a clear and deliberate link between the two, and that what began as techniques developed for Amerikan “enemies” are now being directed at Amerikan citizens. This will inevitably spread.

The CIA/military’s advanced torture methods were exposed in Professor Alfred McCoy’s detailed and thoroughly documented 2006 exposé.5 His book traced the CIA’s efforts to develop and perfect new and less physically evident torture methods over 50 years, which included a research project (from 1950 to 1962) that cost over $1 billion a year that sought to “crack the code of human consciousness.” The Agency tried everything from drugs (including truth serum, mescaline, and LSD), to shock treatment. None of these efforts produced results.
Alongside these more invasive methods, the CIA also funded behavioral studies at top universities like Yale, Princeton, Harvard and McGill. These efforts bore fruit, beginning with McGill.

McGill’s Dr. Donald O. Hebb discovered that he could consistently produce hallucinations and psychotic breakdowns in a person within 48 hours, by cutting them off from environmental stimulation. He did this by having student volunteers lie blindfolded, with soundproof earmuffs and thick mitts on inside a small cubicle for several days. Most of the students quit the
experiment. He also acknowledged that confinement in solitary prison cells produce similar results, only more gradually.6  This was the first breakthrough – “sensory deprivation.”

The CIA’s second advance came from studies of “foreign” torture techniques at Cornell University Medical Center; of the most effective methods discovered was “self-inflicted pain.” This involved making the victim stand for one or two days, which causes the body fluids to drain into the legs which then swell, causing boils that swell and burst, and hallucinations and kidney failure. The victim is told repeatedly during this process, “You’re doing this to yourself. Cooperate with us and you can sit down.”7

The CIA found that combining these two techniques produced revolutionary results while leaving little evidence of abuse. The Agency found its torture model, and in 1963 encoded and distributed it worldwide in its torture handbook, Kubark Counterintelligence Manual.

Under General Geoffrey Miller in 2002, Guantánamo Bay was converted into a torture research lab where the CIA model was advanced even further, adding two key techniques. The two techniques developed at Guantánamo consisted of attacks on cultural sensitivities, such as Arab males’ sensitivity to gender issues and sexual identity, and targeting one’s personal fears and vulnerabilities.
By 2003 the CIA torture model was perfected at Guantánamo, combining this multi-level attack on the human psyche, namely 1) sensory deprivation, 2) self-inflicted pain, and targeting  3) cultural sensitivities, and 4) personal fears and vulnerabilities.

Later in 2003 when resistance to the U.S. invasion of Iraq caught U.S. forces off guard, Miller was sent to Abu Ghraib from Guantánamo to implement his techniques against captured Iraqis. A CD and handbook of his methods were distributed to U.S. military police, intelligence agents, and to General Ricardo Sanchez, Commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, ordered
that Miller’s methods be incorporated into interrogations of Iraqis. It was these practices that came out in the 2004 torture scandals at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo.

Investigations exposed an entire unit at Guantánamo, housing Arab men who had been reduced under these techniques to the mental level of toddlers. They were found sitting on the floor, playing with toys, crying, soiling themselves, etc. As McCoy exposed, torture experts agree that psychological (or “clean”) torture is far more dangerous, destructive and lasting than physical torture, and is far more cruel. “Victims often need extensive treatment to recover from injury far more crippling than mere physical pain. Perpetrators can suffer a dangerous expansion of ego, leading to escalating cruelty and lasting emotional disorders.”

The B-3 Torture Unit
B-3 will be Red Onion’s second torture unit, informally called “Superseg” (segregation within segregation). The first superseg unit was constructed and opened in October 2003 in Red Onion’s C-4 unit, and distinguished itself for extensive physical abuse by guards with the complicity of medical staff. This abuse saw prisoners routinely beaten by guards while handcuffed behind their backs and legs shackled, often resulting in broken teeth and bones and dislocated joints. A Red Onion sergeant Delmer Tate was given charge of C-4 superseg. As a lieutenant now, Tate is to run the new B-3 superseg.8 I was among the first prisoners assigned to C-4 superseg. The conditions and brutality in C-4 were moderated following my compiling and circulating reports of the abuses to the outside and co-founding prisoner advocacy groups with concerned outside citizens like Fed Up!, which generated public protests.

Following such exposures of physical torture, it is a noted pattern of officials to resort to less physically evident methods of abuse and torture. This is the purpose of the new B-3 superseg unit,9 which is completely compatible with Warden Ray’s overall agenda of protecting Red Onion’s image, while maintaining its oppressive designs. The cells in B-3 are being stripped of all furniture except for a heavily fortified steel bed frame and steel toilet/sink combination. The cell’s writing desks and property storage shelves are being removed. The prisoners will have nowhere to sit and write or to store their belongings (what little they may have). There will be no personal amenities in the cells such as televisions (which are allowed in other units for religious, educational, and very limited entertainment programs).

All bedding (mattress, sheets, blankets, etc.) will be removed from the cells from 6am through 10pm every day, leaving the prisoner to stand or sit on cold bare steel and concrete surfaces for 16 hours. Throughout this time the cell will be constantly illuminated with bright fluorescent lights that he cannot control or dim.10 There is no view to the outside world either from within the cells or on the unit’s outside exercise yard.11

Outside exercise will be permitted three times per week for one hour, which will consist of one’s standing idle inside a small dog cage, enclosed within a two story concrete structure that permits a view only of part of the sky directly overhead. The only clothing permitted to protect against the freezing and sub-freezing cold of winter, are thin khaki pants and shirt, a light jacket, low top cloth deck shoes, one pair of regular socks, t-shirt and boxers. Only one layer of each clothing item may be worn and gloves and long johns are not permitted. No clothing will be permitted inside the cells. Only a coarse, loose-fitting, sleeveless, dresslike garment called a “safety smock” may be worn. Cell temperatures, especially surface temperatures, are constantly very low at Red Onion, leaving prisoners cold even when they have bedding and clothing. Many prisoners remain bundled up and wear winter skullcaps inside their cells year-round – even to bed. The cells are constructed so that verbal communication is made difficult and positioned so prisoners cannot see each other.

Each cell in B-3 will be internally equipped with video and audio monitoring equipment that will record all activities and statements of prisoners inside the cells, including confidential legal activities and discussions. Guards working the unit will wear mobile audio-video equipment that will also monitor and record prisoner contacts and conversations with them and in their presences. This extensive surveillance is admittedly to record and study prisoners’ every action and statement, and their adjustments to and the effects of B-3 on them. Prisoners at Guantánamo were subject to similar controlled studies, but not so thoroughly recorded, in the military’s torture experiments. The unit is clearly structured to inflict the multi-leveled assault on the human psyche developed and perfected by the CIA/military, and to permit extensive observation and study of its effects.
First, sensory deprivation is blatant. There is a total loss of the stimulation of normal social environments and relationships, with the attendant stress and chilling effect of living under constant surveillance. This alone can quickly produce extreme psychological pain and damage. There is otherwise little to nothing to do to occupy or stimulate the senses (visual, audio,
olfactory, manual/musculo-skeletal).

This lack of environmental stimulation will both create an increased need for physical and social stimuli, while in turn denying both. The obvious result will be acute mental breakdowns as observed by Dr. Hebb in his sensory deprivation experiments.12 And this addresses only, one component of torture, namely that of sensory deprivation. I have not as yet discussed the suffering and effects of the other three components of the CIA/military torture paradigm which will also be applied in B-3, namely “self-inflicted” pain, and attacks on cultural sensitivities and personal vulnerabilities.  The resultant ‘behaviors’ caused by this mental torture, will then be cited as confirmation of the disruptive nature of B-3 internees, and the “need” to remain and be in the unit. It is a self-serving and self-fulfilling process that is as predictable as breathing.

Second is self-inflicted pain. I have had prior experience with lengthy confinement in cells with no clothing (except underwear) and no bedding during daytime hours. During 1998 at Virginia’s Greensville Correctional Center, I was kept for seven months on an admittedly illegal status, called “white cell status,” very similar to what’s planned for B-3. The result of such conditions is to suffer constant physical pain and fatigue, and Red Onion officials are spreading the message early on, that those chosen for B-3 will be due to their own behaviors and attitudes, and only by changing them in the unit (i.e. cooperating with the captors), will they have any hope of being moved out of B-3.

Being made to remain in a steel and concrete cell without bedding and clothes will compel one to stand at length on a bare cold concrete floor. Sitting on cold steel or concrete for substantial periods causes rheumatic pain deep in the joints, lower back and any body parts resting on or against these surfaces, also chronic hemorrhoids. Standing at length on these surfaces causes swelling and rheumatic pain in the legs, knees, feet, ankles, etc. much like the torture technique studied at Cornell Medical Center.13 The body becomes increasingly vulnerable and sensitive to this pain and suffering, and begins to deteriorate after weeks and months of constant exposure to these conditions. Arthritis develops in the joints, along with chronic musculo-skeletal aches and pains.

Increasing atmospheric temperatures inside the cells offers no relief, since it is virtually impossible to warm the concrete and steel surfaces within a prison cell, especially during spring, autumn and winter months, when it is cool and cold outside. This is because the surfaces inside the cell are part of the same concrete structure outside the prison building that absorbs outside cold temperatures. The physical and mental pain of B-3 will come in many forms, all of which officials will persist is the fault of the prisoners, rather than that of Red Onion officials who are inflicting it.

Third is attacks on cultural sensitivities. A large cage is to be constructed in the middle of the unit, where prisoners brought from their cells will be strip searched. During these searches he must strip naked and manipulate his genitals and buttocks for scrutiny by male guards. This and the attendant dress-like “safety smocks” worn inside the cells is calculated to offend most
prisoners’, especially urban males’, sensitivity to gender issues.14 Being projected as feminine or sexually submissive, especially before one’s peers, is highly offensive in male prison culture, because such prisoners are deemed weak and are targeted with routine domination, violence and rape.

Anyone can recognize the cultural offense of living under constant audio-video surveillance. Especially having one’s most private activities monitored, such as using the commode, bathing, & engaging in the natural act of masturbating – in an environment where normal sexual relations are denied (another component of sensory deprivation). These monitored activities will also be subject to observation by female employees. There will be no medical, mental-health nor legal privacy, as all contacts with such staff, attorney calls, etc. will be conducted under audio-video monitoring. Then there is the cultural clash between prisoners and staff.24

Fourth, personal vulnerabilities will be targeted in many ways. For example, if one delays or refuses to relinquish his bedding at 6 am, h e will be met with immediate force of one or more teams of riot-armored guards, who will “cell extract” him by means of tear gassing him, rushing into the cell, electrocuting him with one or more 75,000 volt electric weapons, and forcefully restraining him.

They will then take the bedding. In process of the ‘cell extraction,’ the guards will invariably get in sly punches, knees and kicks, grabs at the groin and throat, gouges at the eyes, and bend fingers back. All while yelling, “Stop resisting! Stop resisting!,” for effect.  The cell-extracted prisoner will then be placed into in-cell (ambulatory) restraints for up to 48 hours. This will all emphasize his vulnerability and powerlessness, and the futility of resisting or protesting being abused. At Red Onion violent force and cell extractions are the routine first resort to compelling prisoners’ compliance with arbitrary demands, even when no force is needed.

In B-3 Superseg, prisoners will be unable to flush their own commodes. Guards will flush them from outside the cells.15 With these few, and certainly not exhaustive, examples, one can see clearly the continued torture B-3 will inflict on its inhabitants.  Another aspect of torture in B-3 will be prisoners being confined in continued bright lighting for 16 hours per day. This condition, which is general to Red Onion (except for minimum security cadre inmates, who are able to control their in-cell lighting), has caused or contributed to prisoners’ visual impairment at an unprecedented level at Red Onion.10

Living under constant fluorescent lighting causes chronic eye strain, blurring and watering, and visual degradation.   Another factor that I believe contributes to this high rate of visual impairment is lack of visual stimulation in Red Onion’s segregation, where no view of the outside is permitted. This denies regular stimulation and exercise of long range vision and focusing – yet another feature of sensory deprivation.

The Lies that Justify Red Onion
Before and since Red Onion opened in 1998, and its sister supermax Wallens Ridge State Prison, opened in 1999, Virginia officials fed the public a steady stream of lies to justify the expensive construction and operation of these unneeded prisons. Initially it was claimed that these 2,400 supermax beds were needed to securely contain Virginia’s multitude of chronically violent and dangerous prisons.16 Added to this was the claim that those housed at these prisons would never again see society due to long sentences. Both of these rationales were quickly exposed to be lies.

In a critical 1999 investigative report, Human Rights Watch (HRW) found that before Red Onion even opened, the DOC had a review conducted of its prisoner population by James Austin, a national expert on prison classification systems. Austin’s review found that Virginia had one of the nation’s most docile prisoner populations, that “few engage in institutional violence and escapes.”17 But what HRW’s report did find was a high level of violence and racism inflicted on Red Onion’s predominantly Black prisoner population by its near exclusively white staff.18 It also revealed that most of the prisoners were eligible for release, or otherwise did not meet the DOC’s own criteria for supermax housing. Officials repeatedly changed their own security level criteria to justify unqualified prisoners being housed at these supermaxes. As HRW found, Virginia officials kept “adjusting supermax housing criteria not to reflect genuine security and management needs, but simply to fill what would otherwise be half empty – but very expensive – facilities.”19

With these exposures and attendant media criticism, Virginia officials transferred many prisoners away from the supermaxes, and intensified changes in their supermax classification criteria in efforts to qualify more prisoners for supermax housing. Still unable to create substantial numbers of supermax prisoners, they began, at an unprecedented level, contracting to house out-of-state prisoners at the prisons. Prisoners from Washington, D.C., Connecticut, Wyoming, the Virgin Islands, Maryland, and other states were brought in. The DOC secured many of these contracts by boasting of their proven success rates in controlling Virginia’s own violent and dangerous prisoners at the supermaxes. But they failed to mention that Virginia never had a substantial number of violent or dangerous prisoners to bring under control, to begin with.

Immediately upon assignment to the supermaxes, the out-of-state prisoners experienced the same extreme brutality and racism as did the Virginia prisoners. However, unlike Virginia’s prisoners, they had a strong outside support and advocacy system in their home states that immediately went to bat for them. Resulting protests and lawsuits led to the withdrawal of these prisoners from Red Onion and Wallens Ridge – starting with Connecticut,20 New Mexico, and the District of Columbia.

In the face these protests DOC Director Ronald Angelone resigned on May 9, 2002 and a token Black warden, Daniel Braxton, was assigned to Red Onion as window dressing. As my 2004 exposé21 on abuse at Red Onion revealed, abuses continued. In fact, under Braxton abuse and racism escalated at Red Onion, and the first Superseg unit opened in 2003 under his watch.

Despite losing their appeal for out-of-state contracts, and having lost all credible claims for operating even one – let alone two – supermaxes, Virginia officials were still determined to justify the continued operation of these expensive and unneeded prisons. So in 2005 they reduced Wallens Ridge’s security level from supermax to regular maximum security. Subsequently, they cut Red Onion’s prisoner population in half, created unauthorized housing statuses like “Progressive Housing,” brought in scores of minimum security ‘cadre’ inmates ostensibly as workers (but in actuality to fill beds), and were finally forced to eliminate Red Onion’s supermax classification as well. Red Onion was then classified as a segregation prison, and the DOC officially terminated the level 6 (Supermax) security level altogether in February, 2007.

Outside protests continued, much of it generated by my own written reports of abuses at Red Onion. In latter 2004 Warden Braxton was replaced By Tracy S. Ray. Ray came on board with an explicit agenda to repair Red Onion’s image, to curb outside protests and negative media, and emphasized using psychological coercion (especially behavioral incentives) against prisoners as control mechanisms over brutal violence. Although it persists in many forms, physical abuse was greatly reduced under Ray’s watch, and more determined efforts have been made to cover up those abuses that continue. Ray and his appointed investigator Tony Adams actually took the time and initiative to personally monitor my communications to those on the outside, read most of my writings and reports, and implemented ‘counterintelligence’ efforts to isolate me, cut my ties to the outside, frustrate my communication lines, undermine my relationships, attack my character and credibility, and censor my writings.22

Under their designs, I was also targeted with some sixteen indicted criminal charges over a three-year period. This was to consume my limited resources and time defending myself against these charges, since they knew I would not permit any attorneys to represent me. In every case the charges were dismissed or dropped with me representing myself. They also devised to get rid of prisoners’ television sets that had radio units. This is because a local radio station aired a program that allowed live call-ins to prisoners at Red Onion and Wallens Ridge, and gave the prisoners both a voice to the outside that was exposing the prisons’
conditions and efforts to challenge them, and was winning us local empathy.23
With all prior justifications for the claimed need of Red Onion and Wallens Ridge discredited, DOC officials, with Ray and Adams at the forefront, this time sought to validate Red Onion’s use as a segregation prison by ‘manufacturing’ a problem with gang activity. Prior to 2004 Virginia prisons had almost no known gang members or activity. First they created ‘gang pods’ at Red Onion and Wallens Ridge beginning in latter 2004, where suspected rival gang members were forcibly housed together, with hopes of provoking and facilitating violent conflicts between them. Red Onion officials had already long used white supremacist inmates against Black prisoners whom they disliked.2
Red Onion’s white staff members have neither genuine experience with nor exposure to the culture of urban people of color.24 As a result, they actively slap gang profiles on black and brown prisoners for little more than expressing their own cultures in their manners of speech, dress, body, language, writing styles, etc. Most of those gang profiled adamantly deny gang involvement.

Many have been forced to join gangs because of false profiles by officials leading to conflicts with actual members. Adams who was promoted under Ray from working in the prison’s dog kennel to the position of investigator (and suddenly became a self-professed gang specialist), has been instrumental in the whole gang witch-hunt and facilitating racial and gang violence at Red Onion. Adams and his colleagues have not only orchestrated or tried to provoke violent conflicts by deliberately housing “documented” rivals in cells and units together and operating gang pods, but they profile and publicize prisoners as gang members upon the flimsiest evidence and often out of spite.

Adams also classifies, and thereby represses, information related to black civil rights groups and leaders as gangs and gang related. The recent prisoner death at Red Onion occurred under these circumstances. Indeed, it should be placed squarely on Adams’ shoulders, where the prisoner accused of the killing is a self-admitted member of a white gang, while the black prisoner who was killed was a “documented” member of a black street gang. Yet they were housed by Adams in the same unit together, facilitating the fatality.  However, instead of addressing the problem at the root – namely Red Onion officials inciting and facilitating racial and gang violence between prisoners – this tragedy is being used by them to justify Red Onion’s continued existence and the construction a torture unit, which will in no way resolve the causes of what occurred.

Lies and evasions are typical features of DOC public relations, and have been the basis of the justifications given over the years for the expensive construction and continued operations of Red Onion and Wallens Ridge, the real purposes of which have been to create and sustain a lucrative investment climate for various wealthy corporate interests, and to revitalize the sagging local economy in impoverished rural Southwestern Virginia. With blacks and browns mad the victims of the abusive conditions in these prisons. This is why every justification for their existence has been discredited in turn, only to be opportunistically replaced by yet another manufactured one, while attempts to expose and redress abuses and the brutal conditions in the prisons are met with the same – lies, evasions, and cover-ups.

Red Onion: A Fief unto Itself

Under Virginia laws the Virginia Board of Corrections (BOC) is the DOC’s chief oversight authority. It sets out standards and goals which the DOC must apply, and the Board is to monitor the DOC to ensure its compliance.25 Red Onion, however, has always operated completely outside and free of oversight of the BOC and any other authority. The conditions and status to be implemented in B-3 are but one example of this. Under the BOC’s written standards, there exist only three “Special Housing” statuses, namely General Detention, Isolation and Segregation.26 There is no authority for the creation or existence of any other special housing statuses. Only on isolation, a designated temporary
punitive status imposed only for rules violations, may a prisoner’s bedding be removed during daylight hours.27 Prisoners are at all times to be able to flush their own commodes.15 They are to have enclosable storage space inside the cell.28 Cells are to have natural lighting.29 Red Onion officials created the unauthorized two-phase progressive housing status to create bases for keeping prisoners at Red Onion who actually do not qualify for continued segregation
confinement, and to forestall having to transfer those qualified for housing at lower security prisons. Actually, Progressive Housing embodies the conditions and privileges that prisoners are supposed to enjoy on segregation status. As HRW found over a decade ago, segregation status at Red Onion is actually punitive and extremely harsh. Indeed, its conditions impose sensory
deprivation.30

The BOC, which conducts public meetings monthly in Richmond, Virginia, is responsible for and empowered to conduct hearings and summon witnesses, in exercising and enforcing its monitoring and oversight duties within the DOC. Despite the obvious deviations of Red Onion from BOC standards, and over a decade of incessant abuse and racism, this DOC prison has yet to be a subject of such investigative hearings and oversight. In essences Red Onion operates as a fief unto itself, with those who are required by law to monitor its operations and ensure its compliance with the law, refusing to do so. Then the prison is operated by a closed system of blood relatives and friends. Nepotism and cronyism run rampant. There are so many Mullinses and Flemings in the prison, one cannot count them all. From the Major, to Captains, Lieutenants sergeants and corporal guards, to administrative staff, counselors, commissary, maintenance staff etc., the Mullinses and Flemings pervade the prison. Then on both alternate shifts, two McCoy brothers are in charge of security. The prison staff is a closed society of families, friends and lovers, all of whom come from local racially segregated white communities, where racism is a general feature of local culture. There is but one black male guard at the whole prison, and he admittedly keeps his distance from the others.

Blacks who have visited loved ones at the prison and have stayed at local hotels, used local restaurants and shopped at local stores, unanimously comment on the open hostility and unwelcome attitudes they have experienced from local whites.31 These are the people who run Red Onion.

It is no surprise that a black prisoner died at the hands of a white one under supervision of Red Onion staff. What is surprising is that it took so long to happen. The secrecy, lack of oversight, and corruption that pervade Red Onion is nothing new.

Actually it is but a continuation of DOC practices found by the Courts almost 40 years ago. As one Virginia Federal Court found in a landmark case, Virginia prison officials refuse to recognize:
“… that a prison administration is not a fief unto itself. Coupled with this antiquated notion that a prison unit is not even peripherally a part of the community is the practice over the years, that has been shown to the court in this and other prison cases, to envelop the system with a massive veil of secrecy. More concern seems to have been given to the image of the prison’s administration than to granting to its inmates not only such constitutional rights as they are entitled to in spite of their incarceration, but also the basic tenets of conduct which simple fairness, interpreted by even the most uneducated be accorded them as well. These cases are permeated by an apparent lack of understanding on the part of some of the [prison administration] defendants as well as on the part of at least some of their subordinates that the retribution required by law to be inflicted upon a convict has already, within the limits of the legislatively set boundaries, been pronounced by a trial court.”32

In 2006, the Commission of Safety and Abuse in America’s Prisons issued a detailed report, which exposed the conditions of abuse, mismanagement and suffering pervading U.S. prisons.33  Members of the commission consisted of attorneys, former judges, psychiatrists, former wardens, former mayors, etc. Among the commission’s findings were that extended segregated confinement, such as exists at Red Onion in general (which is now an explicitly long-term segregation prison), amount to mental torture and inflict both physical and psychological damage. As this article emphasized, these conditions will be greatly intensified in B-3 Superseg. With the exception of overcrowding, all the abusive conditions found by the Commission in prisons across the country, exist with especial intensity at Red Onion, including the tendency towards secrecy.34 In the report’s conclusion the Commission strongly recommended public oversight of U.S. prisons, which is what I have advocated and actively pursued over the years here at Red Onion.

But my efforts have been persecuted, censored, and I villain-ized and repressed by Red Onion officials. This is because they clearly have much to hide. Anyone secure in their power does not fear exposure or criticism.

After World War II, Germans who lived in communities near Nazi concentration camps were taken on tours of them. Many were shocked and appalled to discover the brutalities and tortures that were taking place in their own back yards, and swore they’d have opposed it if only they’d have known. This is what Red Onion officials fear. Exposure. Their experience with protest on behalf of prisoners from other states taught them that public opinion matters – a lot. Exposure is even more important in this case where advanced methods of torture are now being consciously directed at U.S. citizens. It’s not intended to end with Red Onion, nor with prisoners, which is why such extensive and expensive measures are being taken at Red Onion to monitor and record the effects of the B-3 torture unit on its victims.

As Professor McCoy observed:
“Torture is an extraordinarily dangerous thing. It taps
into the deepest recesses of human consciousness, where
creation and destruction coexist, where the infinite human
capacity for kindness and the infinite human capacity for
cruelty coexist, and it has a powerful perverse appeal.
Once it starts, and both the perpetrators and the powerful
who command them let it spread, it spreads out of control.
I think when the Bush administration gave those orders for
techniques tantamount to torture at the start of the war on
terror, I think it was probably their intention that these be
limited to top al-Qaeda suspects. But within months, U.S.
personnel were torturing hundreds of Afghanis at Bagrahb
near Kabul, and a few months later in 2003, through these
techniques, soldiers were torturing literally thousands of
Iraqis. And you can see in those photos how once it starts,
it becomes this Dante-esque hell, this kind of play palace
of the worst recesses of human consciousness. That’s why
it’s necessary to maintain an absolute prohibition on torture.
There is no such thing as a little bit of torture. The whole
myth of scientific surgical torture, which academic torture
advocates in this country came up with, that’s impossible.
That cannot operate. It will inevitably spread.”35

And it’s already started. From Abu Ghraib to Red Onion.
All Power to the People!

~ Kevin “Rashid” Johnson

Notes and Supplementary Commentary
1 The killing is alleged to have been committed by a white prisoner who is an admitted member of a white exclusivist gang. Many Red Onion prisoners believe the murder to have been racially motivated and facilitated by
guards.
2 On numerous occasions I have documented, in the words of the white prisoners themselves, how Red Onion officials often use racist white inmates to antagonize and assault Black prisoners. Especially by allowing them to carry weapons and bags of fermented feces onto the segregation exercise yards, with which to attack Blacks confined in locked, fenced-in cages beside them. See, e.g. the sworn affidavit of Troy Estep which is on record in the Wise County Circuit Court, filed as Exhibit B in support of a Motion to Transfer Venue, filed on January 22, 2009 in case styled Commonwealth of Virginia v. Kevin Johnson, Case No. CR08F00688-00. In his affidavit Estep candidly admits dislike of Blacks and having developed this attitude from growing up in southwestern Virginia where anti-Black racism “is just part of the culture and how everyone is generally raised ….” He reveals knowing many of the staff at Red Onion from society, having grown up and gone to school with many of them, and states “most of the guards and nurses and other whites who work at ROSP and WRSP feel the same as I do towards Blacks. Some are not in the open about it, like me, but most conceal it when around Blacks or others whom they feel
will not comfortably accept this attitude.” He went on to describe how guards at Red Onion deliberately manipulate racial violence between prisoners. In his own words he described how in segregation guards punish prisoners for
throwing substances on them but do not punish them for doing it to each other. He states how guards who search him before going to exercise allow him to carry bags of feces out to throw on Blacks, and how he’d “been documented over 20 times as having thrown feces on Black inmates in segregation,” but was never punished. He went on to admit Red Onion officials put him in the cell next to me with intentions of provoking and facilitating him throwing feces on me. Not coincidentally, the same white prisoner who is accused of the recent killing at Red Onion was put in the cell next to me, and we went out to exercise numerous times together, during April 2010. Guards remarked repeatedly that they expected him to “kill” another prisoner, and repeatedly referred to me in his presence as a “Black gang leader.” He and I both felt guards were attempting to instigate a conflict between us and he gave me his permission
to expose this.
3 As I pointed out in a prior article, see note 4, below:
“After World War II western governments established an aversion to physical torture, which they embodied in the charter and treaties of their newly established United Nations. This was brought on by the embarrassment and guilt of the Allied Western nations who had stood by passively while the
German Nazis tortured and conducted gruesome experiments on Jews and other Germans (disabled people, dissidents) as well as Slavs, Poles, and Gypsies. On account of this, the newly established CIA became very interested in developing less physically evident methods of mentally breaking and brainwashing enemies.”

4 Kevin “Rashid” Johnson, Amerikan Prisons Are Government Sponsored Torture, Socialism and Democracy, Vol. 21, no. 1 (March 2007).
5 Alfred W. McCoy, A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, From the Cold War to the War on Terror (New York: Henry Holt, 2006).
6 As CIA researcher Dr. Albert Biderman discovered “the effect of isolation on the brain function of the prisoner is much like that which occurs if he is beaten, starved or deprived of sleep.” Op. cit. note 4. As I stated in my previous article:
“The Amerikan reformers who first devised the penitentiary believed that criminals could be ‘reformed’ through solitary confinement, labor and religious indoctrination. The use of solitary confinement and isolation – sensory deprivation – began at Philadelphia’s Eastern State Penitentiary in the 1820s. But what was actually discovered was that conditions of sensory deprivation in
isolation caused mental deterioration and psychosis. Leading writers like Charles Dickens and Charles Darwin upon touring the penitentiary spoke out against its conditions of daily tampering with the mysteries of the brain to be immeasurably worse than any torture of the body. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled such solitary confinement mentally destructive and outlawed it “… It stated: ‘A considerable number of prisoners fell, after even a short confinement, into a semi-fatuous condition, from which it was next to impossible to remove them, and others became “Abu Ghraib Comes to America” 13 by Kevin “Rashid” Johnson October 30, 2010 violently insane; others still committed suicide, while those who stood the ordeal better were
generally not reformed and in most cases did not recover sufficient mental activity to be of subsequent service to the community.’ In Re Medley, 134 U.S. 160, 168 (1890). “Many modern courts have found the same conditions and injuries to prisoners from confinement in modern control units as did the high court of 1890 in the Medley case …. See, e.g. Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146 (1995): ‘[M]any, if not most, inmates in SHU [Special Housing Unit]
experience some degree of psychological trauma in relation to their extreme social isolation and the severely restricted environmental stimulation in SHU.’ This court concluded that confinement under such conditions ‘may press the outer bounds of what humans can psychologically tolerate … The psychological consequences of living in these units for long periods of time are predictably
destructive, and the potential for these psychological stressors to precipitate various forms of psychopathology is clear cut.’ Another court found that ‘isolating human beings from other human beings year after year or even month after month can cause substantial psychological damage, even if the isolation is not total.’ Davenport v. DeRoberts, 884 F. zd1310, 1313, 1316 (1989).
7 “Self-inflicted pain” may be applied in a variety of ways, e.g. compelling one to stand at length, kneel or sit on hard surfaces at length, remain in cramped and painful positions, etc. These are called “stress positions.” The key is that the body is used as a weapon against itself, without an external device, thus giving the impression that the victim is causing his/her own suffering. As the 1983 Honduran tortures manual, modeled after the CIA’s 1963 torture handbook, teaches “pain which he [the subject] feels he is inflicting upon himself is more likely to sap his resistance.” Op. cit. Note 5, p. 136.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Prison Conditions, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Abu Ghraib Comes to Amerika

  1. Pingback: Unprison 2011-2013 Index | unprison

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s